How Much Is My Self-Storage Business Worth? A Guide for Spanish Operators

Spain’s self-storage industry has entered a period of accelerated transformation. Since 2019, the number of facilities across the country has more than doubled, driven by a confluence of structural and behavioral shifts: rising urban density, changing lifestyles, the growth of ecommerce, and increased demand for flexible storage solutions. As a result, self-storage has evolved from a niche product into a recognized, high-margin, real estate-backed investment category.

As a consequence of this growth in demand and operational maturity, institutional investors began to take serious notice. In an environment where traditional asset classes like office and retail have struggled with structural vacancy and evolving tenant expectations, self-storage emerged as a highly attractive alternative. It offers strong fundamentals, recurring cash flow, and inflation-protected pricing — features that align well with the objectives of real estate funds, family offices, and private equity platforms. Larger operators are also consolidating market share via acquisitions of smaller, independent operators. These buyers aren’t just interested in new developments — they are seeking existing, cash-flowing assets that can be brought under centralized platforms.

This has left many independent owners wondering:

“What could my self-storage business actually be worth?”

The answer is not always obvious. Whether you own your property or operate on a leasehold basis (as many in Spain do), valuations depend on a range of factors — not just financial performance, but also lease quality, location, and the investor’s own underwriting strategy. This article offers a practical, data-supported framework to help Spanish operators understand what drives value in today’s self-storage market — and how to prepare, even if a sale isn’t on the horizon.

Understanding What Investors Are Valuing

To understand how both real estate and business operations are valued in a self-storage investment, we need to consider several common valuation methods used by investors. Each approach offers a different lens — and which one gets applied depends on who the buyer is and what kind of asset you’re selling.

EBITDA Multiples

In the Spanish self-storage market, this is one of the most commonly used valuation tools. Rather than focusing on the property, it looks at the business itself — how profitable it is, how scalable it might be, and what kind of earnings it generates. EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It’s a clean way to measure your core operating performance, excluding financing and accounting differences.

If your facility produces €300,000 in EBITDA and the buyer applies an 8x multiple, your business might be valued at €2.4 million. This method is especially popular for leasehold businesses, or for buyers looking to build a branded platform. For freehold sites or assets with strong cash flow and branding, the multiple can climb even higher. Typical ranges for leasehold-based businesses in Spain tend to fall between 5x and 10x, while freehold assets — particularly those that are mature and stabilized — can reach 12x to 20x.

Cap Rate (Capitalization Rate)

Cap rates are the go-to method when a buyer is also acquiring the property itself. They express the relationship between your property’s net operating income (NOI) and its value:

Value = NOI / Cap Rate

Think of it this way: the cap rate is the return an investor expects to earn on the asset’s income. If your site generates €250,000 in NOI and the buyer applies a 6.25% cap rate, that implies a valuation of €4 million. The lower the cap rate, the higher the value — and the more confident the buyer is in your asset’s income stream. NOI here refers to rental income minus all operating costs, excluding financing and depreciation — essentially, your property’s real cash flow.

Cap rates are more common when the buyer is a real estate investor, and especially when the facility is stabilized and owned freehold. They’re influenced by location, market maturity, asset quality, and lease structure.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)

DCF is a more complex approach — but very useful for assets that are still ramping up, or have room to grow. Instead of focusing only on current income, DCF looks at future performance: what cash flows will the asset generate over the next 10–15 years, and what are those cash flows worth today?

This method is typically used by institutional buyers or developers who need to underwrite risk and potential. It’s more sensitive to assumptions (like how fast occupancy will rise, or what rents will look like in 5 years), but allows for detailed, scenario-based valuation. It’s ideal for facilities that are new, under expansion, or not yet stabilized.

Price per Net Lettable Area (€/m²)

This method is more of a shorthand — used early in conversations or for comparing broad market trends. It looks at the asset’s total rentable space and assigns a value per square metre. In Spain, freehold sites in core markets may trade for €1,500–2,200/m², while leasehold deals tend to range from €400–800/m², depending on lease quality and income.

It’s quick and easy — but it ignores things like profitability, lease terms, or ramp-up status. So while it’s helpful for rough benchmarking, serious buyers will always move on to a more income-based method.

With these tools in mind, let’s look at how ownership structure impacts valuation.

Leaseholds vs. Freeholds: What Investors Really See

In Spain, many self-storage businesses operate on leasehold terms — that is, the operator rents the space rather than owning it. This model has enabled fast growth in urban areas, where buying real estate outright is often cost-prohibitive. And while freehold assets are typically favored by institutional investors — who benefit from long-term control, capital appreciation, and refinancing options — well-structured leaseholds are still attractive under the right conditions.

Leaseholds play a critical role in the Spanish market. When structured correctly, they allow access to prime urban locations that would otherwise be too expensive to acquire, enable faster expansion across a city without tying up capital in real estate, and support high-margin operations, particularly in dense areas with strong pricing power. It’s worth noting that not all NOI is valued equally. A compact, high-performing site in central Madrid generating €150,000 in NOI may be more valuable than a larger site on the outskirts producing €250,000 — especially when long-term positioning and brand visibility are taken into account. But the key lies in the lease structure.

Institutional buyers have very specific requirements: they typically look for a minimum lease length of 15 years, with at least 10 years remaining at the time of sale; assignability, so the lease can be transferred to a new owner; predictable rent escalations and no major restrictions on operations or modifications; and ideally, an option to purchase the property in the future. If your site has only 4 or 5 years left on the lease and no renewal or purchase option, it will likely be non-investable for most professional buyers. The risk of eviction, rent hikes, or operating restrictions is simply too high, and it makes cash flow projections unreliable. These sites may be sellable to private buyers or operators, but not at institutional valuations.

How Lease Terms Affect Valuation — Even When Using EBITDA Multiples

While leasehold businesses are most commonly valued using EBITDA multiples in Spain, some investors still reference cap rates to benchmark risk — especially when comparing leasehold and freehold returns side by side.

The reasoning is simple: the shorter or weaker the lease, the greater the uncertainty about income continuity, rent terms, and operational control. That uncertainty leads investors to demand a higher return — whether expressed as a higher cap rate or a lower EBITDA multiple — which reduces the valuation.

So while cap rates may not be the primary method used for leasehold valuations, they can still be a helpful way to illustrate the impact of lease terms on perceived risk and pricing.

Example:

  • Freehold, Madrid, €200,000 NOI, 6.0% cap → €3.33 million
  • Leasehold, excellent terms, 10+ years remaining, option to buy, 8.0% cap → €2.5 million
  • Leasehold, weak lease, 5 years remaining, no purchase option, 9.5% cap → €2.1 million

These cap rates loosely translate to implied EBITDA multiples — with the strong leasehold falling somewhere around 8–10x, and the weaker lease closer to 6x or lower.

In short: lease quality has a direct and material impact on valuation — no matter which method is applied.

Know Your Value, Even If You’re Not Selling

Even if you have no intention of selling, understanding your business’s value helps you make smarter strategic decisions. Knowing how buyers evaluate your site — and what methods they’re likely to apply — gives you more control when negotiating, expanding, or optimizing your facility. It can guide you in:

Renegotiating your lease terms Planning site expansions or upgrades Benchmarking against future acquisition offers Preparing clean, investor-ready financials

Final Thoughts

Spain’s self-storage market is no longer an emerging niche — it’s a rapidly maturing investment class. Buyers are active, capital is available, and valuations are increasingly driven by professional standards. For smaller operators, this shift highlights the importance of understanding how their business is valued — not just to assess potential offers, but to confidently participate in a market that is increasingly shaped by larger, better-informed players.

Whether you’re considering a sale now or simply planning for the future, understanding what drives value — and how investors think — is essential.

With the right lease structure, operational performance, and occupancy profile, even a small facility can command strong interest and serious offers.

From Washington to London: How a Second Trump Presidency Could Reshape Self-Storage Investments

Since Donald Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025, a flurry of executive orders has begun reshaping the economic landscape, introducing trade barriers, deregulation, and federal workforce reductions. The administration’s decision to reintroduce tariffs—25% on imports from Mexico and Canada and 10% on imports from China—has already triggered economic uncertainty. These policies, combined with plans to cut federal employment by hundreds of thousands of jobs, could have far-reaching effects on inflation, interest rates, and investment flows. For the self-storage industry, the shifting economic terrain presents both challenges and opportunities.

A Strong Market Meets Economic Uncertainty

he self-storage industry entered 2025 in relatively strong shape. In Europe, M&A activity surged in 2024, with transaction volumes reaching €875 million by the end of the year—triple the volume seen in 2023. An additional €546 million in pending deals suggests another record-breaking year is possible. Institutional investors have been particularly active, drawn by self-storage’s resilience amid high interest rates and an uncertain economic climate. In the US, despite economic headwinds, private equity and real estate investment trusts (REITs) continued to pursue acquisitions, albeit with more selective criteria.

However, with Trump’s policy shifts now in motion, the outlook for self-storage investment, development, and operations is evolving rapidly.

Capital Markets and Interest Rates: A New Dynamic for Investment

One of the biggest uncertainties facing the industry is how the Federal Reserve will respond to the administration’s trade policies. If tariffs push inflation higher, the Fed may be forced to maintain or even increase interest rates rather than pivot to rate cuts as some had anticipated. This would make financing for self-storage acquisitions and developments more expensive, potentially slowing down expansion plans. While liquidity remains available, the rising cost of capital is already forcing investors to reassess deal structures, with an increasing reliance on private debt, joint ventures, and sale-leasebacks.

In Europe, the effects of US policy may be more indirect but still significant. Many US-based funds have been active in the European self-storage sector, and a shift in capital allocation priorities—whether due to trade disputes, economic uncertainty, or higher US yields—could lead to a cooling of the recent M&A momentum. A survey by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union recently indicated that 90% of US firms operating in Europe expect transatlantic relations to deteriorate under the new administration, a factor that could further impact capital flows into European self-storage assets.

Development Costs and Supply Chain Disruptions

Tariffs on steel and aluminum imports are set to increase development costs for self-storage projects across all markets, as steel remains a core component of facility construction worldwide. Rising costs could impact both new builds and expansions, particularly for operators relying on prefabricated steel structures. Additionally, electronic components—essential for modern self-storage operations, including access control systems, kiosks, and AI-driven facility management—could also see price increases due to trade restrictions and supply chain disruptions.

Beyond tariffs, broader geopolitical uncertainty—such as trade disputes between major economies, regional conflicts, and shifting diplomatic alliances—poses further risks to supply chain stability. Delays in material shipments, fluctuating costs, and restricted access to key technologies could complicate project timelines. Operators and developers who planned expansions under the assumption of stable material costs may now face budget overruns or project delays, requiring more flexible sourcing strategies and contingency planning.

M&A Activity: Will the Boom Continue?

With self-storage proving resilient through past economic cycles, many investors see it as a safe haven in uncertain times. However, rising costs and borrowing constraints could dampen the aggressive deal-making seen in the past two years. If capital remains expensive and operating costs rise, larger operators may shift focus from acquisitions to organic growth, maximizing yield from existing portfolios rather than aggressively expanding.

At the same time, the current climate could create new acquisition opportunities. If higher costs pressure smaller operators, consolidation could accelerate, with major players acquiring distressed assets at more attractive valuations. This could be particularly true in secondary US markets, where smaller operators with weaker balance sheets may struggle with financing challenges.

Looking beyond the US and Europe, shifts in capital market conditions could also influence the international expansion strategies of large self-storage operators. If US capital markets tighten, major REITs and investment funds may turn their attention to alternative growth regions, such as the Middle East or Eastern Europe, where supply-demand fundamentals remain favorable, and regulatory environments are more stable. European operators, too, may seek opportunities in less traditional markets as a hedge against potential transatlantic instability.

Consumer Behavior & Demand Trends

Beyond investment and development, Trump’s policies could also have a more direct impact on self-storage demand. Economic uncertainty often leads to increased demand for storage, as individuals downsize and businesses look for cost-effective space solutions. If tariffs and inflation put pressure on consumer spending, more people may seek temporary storage solutions while adjusting their living arrangements. Businesses, particularly those affected by supply chain disruptions, could also turn to self-storage as an alternative warehousing solution to manage fluctuating inventory needs.

Historically, self-storage has performed well in both economic booms and downturns. However, if household disposable incomes shrink due to inflation or job losses from federal workforce reductions, discretionary spending may be impacted. This raises the question of whether demand will shift more toward budget-conscious storage options, or if price sensitivity will lead to changes in consumer behavior across different self-storage market segments.

A Longer-Term Perspective: What Happens Post-Trump?

While investors must navigate the near-term effects of the current administration’s policies, there is also the question of what happens beyond this term. Trump’s economic policies—particularly on trade, taxation, and deregulation—could be reversed by a future administration, making long-term investment strategies more complex. Investors weighing expansion or acquisitions must consider not just the immediate policy landscape but also the likelihood of regulatory shifts in the next political cycle.

Looking Ahead: What to Expect in the Coming Months

While self-storage remains one of the most resilient real estate sectors, the second Trump administration introduces new variables that investors and operators must navigate. Higher interest rates, supply chain disruptions, and shifting capital flows could all reshape the landscape.

In the US, much will depend on whether inflation forces the Fed to maintain a restrictive monetary policy stance. If borrowing costs remain high, we could see a slowdown in new developments and a more selective approach to acquisitions. Meanwhile, in Europe, transatlantic tensions could impact investment flows, and developers will need to assess how tariffs and rising costs might influence project feasibility.

Ultimately, self-storage has historically adapted well to changing economic conditions, and despite the challenges, new opportunities will emerge. Whether through strategic acquisitions, alternative financing models, or operational efficiencies, industry leaders will need to remain agile to capitalize on the evolving market dynamics. The next few months will be critical in determining how Trump’s policies reshape the sector—and whether the recent boom can continue in a more uncertain global economy.